No subject

and libdrm-glamo to see uploaded - right?

And for these

fso-deviced              - Needs upload to Debian
fso-frameworkd           - Needs update in Debian
openmoko-files-config    - Needs update in Debian

we are currently clarifying this vala 0.9 issue, right?

Cheers,

Steffen


On 08/06/2010 09:29 AM, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> 2010/8/6 Sebastian Reichel <elektranox at gmail.com>:
>   
>> I just removed these packages from pkg-fso:
>>     
> Thanks.
>
>   
>> Here is a list of remove-candidates:
>>
>> xf86-video-glamo         - Already in Debian, same Version
>> libdrm-glamo             - Already in Debian, same Version
>>     
> xf86-video-glamo in pkg-fso is one notch newer than in Debian, and is
> the same version but compiled with Glamo DRM + KMS support for those
> who want to experiment with (self-compiled) 2.6.32 or 2.6.34 kernels.
> libdrm-glamo is not in Debian at all.
>
>   
>> libfsoresource           - Needs update in Debian
>>     
> Is there a difference between pkg-fso:s 0.1.1~git20100517-1~fso and
> Debian's 0.1.1~git20100517-1?
>
>   
>> fso-deviced              - Needs upload to Debian
>> fso-frameworkd           - Needs update in Debian
>> openmoko-files-config    - Needs update in Debian
>>     
> Right.
>
> -Timo
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-fso-maint mailing list
> pkg-fso-maint at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
>