Thu Aug 5 15:37:00 UTC 2010
and libdrm-glamo to see uploaded - right?
And for these
fso-deviced - Needs upload to Debian
fso-frameworkd - Needs update in Debian
openmoko-files-config - Needs update in Debian
we are currently clarifying this vala 0.9 issue, right?
On 08/06/2010 09:29 AM, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> 2010/8/6 Sebastian Reichel <elektranox at gmail.com>:
>> I just removed these packages from pkg-fso:
>> Here is a list of remove-candidates:
>> xf86-video-glamo - Already in Debian, same Version
>> libdrm-glamo - Already in Debian, same Version
> xf86-video-glamo in pkg-fso is one notch newer than in Debian, and is
> the same version but compiled with Glamo DRM + KMS support for those
> who want to experiment with (self-compiled) 2.6.32 or 2.6.34 kernels.
> libdrm-glamo is not in Debian at all.
>> libfsoresource - Needs update in Debian
> Is there a difference between pkg-fso:s 0.1.1~git20100517-1~fso and
> Debian's 0.1.1~git20100517-1?
>> fso-deviced - Needs upload to Debian
>> fso-frameworkd - Needs update in Debian
>> openmoko-files-config - Needs update in Debian
> pkg-fso-maint mailing list
> pkg-fso-maint at lists.alioth.debian.org
More information about the pkg-fso-maint