[Pkg-gajim-maintainers] Bug#884358: Bug#884311: Gajim: problem with latest python-openssl

Bjoern Schiessle bes at schiessle.org
Fri Dec 15 14:28:09 UTC 2017


Hi all,

same here. The version from experimental works fine for me and I like
the new Gnome3 look&feel. Only drawback, I can no longer install
plugins directly from gajim with the plugin manager. Probably because
this is not a final release yet. But as the most important plugins are
packaged I would be fine with moving this to unstable.

Thanks!
BJörn

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:51:00 +0200 Dimitris wrote:

> Hey Martin, all
> 
> Just installed it from experimental, it brings a lot of python3-*
> dependencies instead of the python-* ones in unstable, but it starts
> normally as expected.
> got some other errors and a database error(fixed), but this bug is no
> longer there. gajim starts ok.
> 
> i must say i prefer the old looks of gajim (dont really like the
> gnome3 approach) but that's something personal, usability is what
> counts more. so i would also be in favor of porting it to unstable.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> dimitris.
> 
> 
> On 12/15/2017 03:01 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Dear Bjoern, dear Dimitris,
> > 
> > thank you for your bug reports! I ask you for a favour:
> > 
> > Could you please try Gajim from Debian experimental?
> > The plugins for the new Gajim are in experimental, too,
> > if you need them.
> > 
> > I'm not yet sure, whether I will fix this bug in a new
> > Gajim 0.16.8-something, because IMHO Gajim
> > 0.16.11-somethingelse already works very fine for me.
> > 
> > If the new Gajim works for you as well, I would do the
> > next upload to unstable instead of experimental.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > Cheers, Martin
> >   
> 
> 



-- 
Björn Schießle <bjoern at schiessle.org>
www: http://www.schiessle.org
twitter: @schiessle
gnupg/pgp key: 0x0x2378A753E2BF04F6
verify: https://keybase.io/BeS
fingerprint: 244F CEB0 CB09 9524 B21F B896 2378 A753 E2BF 04F6



More information about the Pkg-gajim-maintainers mailing list