[Pkg-gambas-devel] New release

[Ian Haywood]

On 26/10/13 18:19, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:

> I'll try to use small chunks of free time next week in order to fix as
> many things as possible, but at the end of the week I'll upload the
> packages to the archive even if they are not totally in good shape. I
> think we must focus in putting the latest version of gambas3 in Debian
> before its freeze. Later we can fix the remaining issues. If you can
> help with the fixes, using patches, or in the newmaster branch, it
> would be great.
I've managed to get the lintian list down to this on newmaster.

W: gambas3-gb-sdl: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/gambas3/gb.sdl.sound.so.0.0.0
W: gambas3-script: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gbs3
W: gambas3-script: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gbw3
W: gambas3-gb-compress: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/gambas3/gb.compress.so.0.0.0
W: gambas3-gb-data: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/gambas3/gb.data.so.0.0.0
W: gambas3-gb-compress-zlib: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/gambas3/gb.compress.zlib.so.0.0.0
W: gambas3-gb-compress-bzlib2: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/gambas3/gb.compress.bzlib2.so.0.0.0
W: gambas3-gb-sdl-sound: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/gambas3/gb.sdl.sound.so.0.0.0

"hardening-no-fortify-functions" is generated because lintian believes
we are not using a particular GCC security features. However we are
using it, it's just those binaries are too small to detect it (otherwise
the warning would occur for all of our binary packages)
My understanding is we can ignore it.

The missing man files I don't get: gbs3.1 and gbw.1 are there in debian/
and references are in the rules file to be installed.

Ian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gambas-devel/attachments/20131028/8addb539/attachment.sig>