[Pkg-ganeti-devel] [SCM] Ganeti packaging branch, for-review, updated. debian/2.7.0-1-23-gf0feb68

[Apollon Oikonomopoulos]

On 21:19 Wed 17 Jul     , Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:51:18PM +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > On 20:45 Tue 16 Jul     , Iustin Pop wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:22:47PM +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > > > On 20:19 Tue 16 Jul     , Iustin Pop wrote:
> > > > > Yep, I agree. ganeti (without '2') was last present a long while ago, 
> > > > > so
> > > > > it's a good time to migrate (via transitional pkg, etc.).
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > iustin
> > > > 
> > > > Good, I pushed the change earlier this evening. Can you have a look?
> > > 
> > > Looks good (from a brief look), but please make sure upgrades work
> > > correctly (either via piuparts or manual testing).
> > 
> > Did some thorough manual testing and everything seems to work fine.  
> > Should I merge to master and push?
> 
> I would say so, yes. In the debian/ directory are two scripts I used for
> testing the packages (burnin-xen and burnin-fake), and usually I would
> update/build/install the package, run these two, and if they pass make a
> new release.

Would you like to share the busybox OS definition? :)

I already ran a KVM burnin with the debootstrap OS on plain instances 
and it worked fine (I should really build a test cluster-in-a-cluster).

Do you think we should release -2, or wait for a new upstream version?

Cheers,
Apollon