Bug#329759: unfixed

[Loic Minier]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote:
> Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this.  The prerm script needs to
> not fail if gconf2 is unavailable.

 Can you -vv your remark?  You want the dh_gconf to be more robust?

 Policy seems to grant explicitely this usage:

    The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or
    postrm scripts require the package to be present in order to run.
    Note, however, that the postrm cannot rely on any non-essential
    packages to be present during the purge phase.

-- 
Loïc Minier <lool at dooz.org>