[pkg-horde] Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software

[Francesco Poli]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:57:38 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:33:27 +0200 Gregory Colpart wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:42:36AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > > > Could you confirm me that my package will be DFSG-compliant ?
> > > > 
> > > > Not entirely, but it looks like it probably will be.
> > > 
> > > I don't agree.
> > > The license under analysis is fully quoted below (for future
> > > reference). I do *not* think that a work released solely under
> > > this license can be considered to comply with the DFSG.
> > 
> > To sum up, I hope persuading upstream to do one of following
> > actions:
> > 
> > - give permission to Debian project to package his softwares
> >   (like Apache Fundation for apache-1.3 woody packages [1]),
> 
> That way it should go in main, though.
> At least, that's my opinion.

Oooops!   :p
What I actually intended to write was:

  "That way it should *not* go in main, though."

Sorry for having incorrectly stated the opposite of what I meant...  :-(


-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-horde-hackers/attachments/20060429/21475e72/attachment.pgp