[pkg-horde] RFS: sork-vacation-h3

Lionel Elie Mamane lionel at mamane.lu
Thu Jul 20 16:31:53 UTC 2006


On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:03:55AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 04:34:42AM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
>> I'm looking for a sponsor to my sork-vacation-h3 package.

>> W: sork-vacation-h3: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/horde3/vacation/files/empty.gdbm.bin
>> W: sork-vacation-h3: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/horde3/vacation/files/empty.hash3.bin
>> W: sork-vacation-h3: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/horde3/vacation/files/empty.btree.bin
>> W: sork-vacation-h3: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/horde3/vacation/files/empty.hash.bin
>> W: sork-vacation-h3: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/horde3/vacation/files/empty.empty.bin

>> This files/empty.* are empty DB files (with various DB format).
>> They are necessary to set empty Vacation DB then I think lintian
>> override should be include. Say me if you agree.

> Are they supposed to be changed later? If so they should be put into
> /var instead and probably with a symlink from the normal location.

I suppose they are copied (or linked) into a user's working directory
when needed? I don't really see how they would be _needed_, as one
can always run the creation-utility on a an empty input to get them,
but well... if they do it that way, <shrug>.

What I wonder is whether they are arch-dependent or not. They cannot
be in /usr/share if they are arch-dependent.

-- 
Lionel



More information about the pkg-horde-hackers mailing list