[Pkg-hpijs-devel] Bug#452574: Bug#452574: spurious version numbering for hpijs packages

[Mark Purcell]

On Friday 23 November 2007, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Since version 2.7.x, both hplip and hpijs do have the same version
> number, making combined version numbers like '2.7.10+2.7.10-2'
> redundant. Additionally, it looks silly. ;)
>
> Please consider introducing  a consistent version number for all hplip
> and hpijs related packages.

Fabian,

Thanks for your report.

As you maybe aware we have a large amount of fixes to get hplip into a stable 
state before I would be happy for release with Debian.  The consistency of 
version numbers whilst a presentation issue, doesn't detract from the 
functionality so will be looked at, but with a low priority.

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-hpijs-devel/attachments/20071201/dfd5fd10/attachment.pgp