[Pkg-ime-devel] Re: Bug#285623: Should depend or suggest with scim-*-scoket packages for enabling full functions

[Ming Hua]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 08:16:25PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:55:40PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > I noticed you made some new changes on README.Debian yesterday.  I like
> > most of them (actually I was going to point out that scim-chinese is for
> > PinYin input method only.  
> 
> Yes.  So some people may wish this package to be called scim-pinyin to
> be neutral.  I do not care much about ownership of the word "chinese"
> but this should be post-sarge change for sure.

I totally agree.  Just FYI:  The scim-chinese issue is a historical
lugguage -- James had the ambition to write an intellectual IM for most
Chinese input methods, but only finished the PinYin part, and had to
settle for the simpler table-based engine on others.  But the name
stays.

> As for scim-config-gconf, I thought it is a configulation module and
> added it long time ago.  Not enough thinking behind.
> 
> Please make modification which makes sense to you.
> 
> I think explanation of what this package offer and what kinnd of
> difference this package makes will be nice to know too.

I've removed the scim-config-gconf recommendation, and add some notes
about the roles of scim and scim-gtk2-immodule.  I also updated the
upstream website links.

I think the package are good to be uploaded now.  Osamu, do you have
time to test (I've tested with pbuilder, just to make sure) and upload
it?  Thanks.

> Osamu

Ming
2004.12.22