[Pkg-ime-devel] Re: SCIM 1.0.1 checked in svn

Osamu Aoki osamu@debian.org
Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:10:34 +0200

Hi, thanks for quick fix.

I just made tree only.  I was going to work on this but weather was too
good.  It is nice autum in Belgium.

On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 04:52:39PM +0900, Hidetaka Iwai wrote:
>  1. debian/control: There is no need to depend on libgtk2.0-dev.


>  2. debian/install, debian/watch, debian/copyright: These files seem
>     to be for scim-chinese, so I changed these for scim-m17n.

I agree mostly and applied.  See my other mail for question.

> And I think it is better to change the package name of scim-m17n as
> scim-imengine-m17n, if the package name of scim-uim is
> scim-imengine-uim.

Then we need to do:
This makes sense but this will increase chance of missing Sarge.

Hmmm... I think I will use this new package name convention only for new
packages.  OK, I will do so.

Then for etch, I can chenge these together with :
    scim-server-socket --> scim-immodule-socket 
transition if others agree.  "server" is difficult to understand when we
are talking application and X together in the same context.