[Pkg-ime-devel] scim-tables 0.5.8-1 is ready

Osamu Aoki osamu at debian.org
Mon Jul 21 02:41:03 UTC 2008


On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:00:50AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:42:21PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > scim-tables 0.5.8-1 is ready, in this new upstream, 3 new input
> > methods added. and one new language supported (Ukrainian).
> > 
> > you can check the package at [1] or [2].
> > 
> > [1] dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-tables/scim-tables_0.5.8-1.dsc
> > [2] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ime/scim-tables/trunk/
> > 
> > the package is already lintian clean, but I have not send the RFS to
> > debian-mentors, because I think i should get maintainer's bless first.
> > :)
> 
> With newer skim/KDE, should we keep disabling skim in dpatch?  I have no idea.

As I build, it causes many warning.  I guess touching them in Debian
diff may be too much for now but please create proper patch and file
them to upstream.

I am talking about...

scim_generic_table.h: In member function 'bool
GenericTableContent::is_multi_wildcard_char(char) const':
scim_generic_table.h: In member function 'bool GenericTableContent::is_valid_char(char) const':
scim_generic_table.h:512: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
scim_generic_table.h: In member function 'bool GenericTableContent::is_single_wildcard_char(char) const':
scim_generic_table.h:513: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
scim_generic_table.h: In member function 'bool GenericTableContent::is_multi_wildcard_char(char) const':

Also, shared library warning exist.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libdl.so.2 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/table.so debian/scim-modules-table/usr/bin/scim-make-table" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgmodule-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcairo.so.2 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpango-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libatk-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/scim-modules-table/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/table-imengine-setup.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).

Can you check these are OK?

Osamu



More information about the Pkg-ime-devel mailing list