[Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#715568: May be different issue

[Hongzheng Wang]

Hi Osamu,

systemd is installed but I didn't do any special setting for it.  I am
not sure what is the problem you are facing with systemd and
gnome-shell 3.8.

For ibus-anthy, I found some issues.  If the experimental version of
ibus-anthy is installed, I cannot activate it at all.  I have added
"Japanese" as an input source from gnome 3.8 "region & language
settings".  But even I choose manually "ja", ibus-anthy is still not
activated.

By contrast, if I install the sid version of ibus-anthy, this Japanese
input method is always activated in all applications.  I found
ibus-googlepinyin from sid has the same issue.

I wonder if there is any special setting needed for gnome 3.8?

Thanks,
Hongzheng

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Osamu Aoki <osamu at debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:09:43PM -0700, Hongzheng Wang wrote:
>> Hi Osamu,
>>
>> We may be seeing different issues ...
>
> Maybe ...
>
>> I am running gnome-shell 3.8 from experimental.
>
> So you are doing better than me.  3.4 here.  No systemd yet.
>
>> After installing ibus-1.5.2-2, I found ibus cannot start.
>
> I updated to 1.5.2-4 which has all the upstream patches included.
>
>> Error messages show kind of connection refuses (when I try to start
>> the daemon manually).  I checked and found it is due to libibus-1.0-0
>> is installed (required by ibus-pinyin).  So, I wonder if the new ibus
>> needs to be conflict against that.
>
> I think I fail since I am not yet using 3.8.  Can you point me to a
> document which tells us to set up  gnome-shell 3.8 and systemd?
>
> You did better and are hitting the real bug.  So package seems better
> than I thought it may be.
>
>> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Problem may be old ibus-pinyin in sid is not compatible with ibus 1.5.
> There is ibus-pinyin 1.5.0 which needs to be packaged.
>
> Do you observe the same problem with experimental ibus-anthy?
>
> Regards,
>
> Osamu
> ====
>
> Few issues I observed:
>
> There seems to exist 2 ABI now: 1.4 and 1.5.  Somehow library package name
> always 1.0-0 now jumped to 1.0-5 matching libibus-1.0.so.0 and
> libibus-1.0.so.5.  Quite confusing.
>
> Normal libraries do not cause even if we install many versions.  So I
> removed "Replaces: libibus-1.0-0".
>
>
>