[Pkg-ime-devel] ibus-array maintenance
kengyu at lexical.tw
Wed Sep 4 13:57:44 UTC 2013
2013/9/3 Osamu Aoki <osamu at debian.org>:
> Great to hear from you.
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:31:29PM +0800, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
>> 2013/9/2 Osamu Aoki <osamu at debian.org>:
>> > Hi Keng-Yu Lin,
>> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:06:11PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> > I have not got any response for 2 months from Keng-Yu Lin.
>> > See http://bugs.debian.org/715180
>> The automatic notification also indicated that the patch was included
>> in my upload and the bug is closed now.
>> Any kind of extra response you expect?
> I was expecting response on my initial message
> which goes more than just bug. I was a bit confused since someone
> uploaded package (now I know it was you. I had some confusion on the
> recent dm upload protocol. Excuse me.)
>> > I am going to upload another one for experimental for ibus 1.5
>> > transition and make this package team upload by pkg-ime group. I have
>> > no intention to exclude or overrule Keng-Yu Lin but no point wasting
>> > time either.
>> Any specific bug you are going to fix with the upload. As I do not see
>> any in BTS?
> Well it is package transition from ibus 1.4 to ibus 1.5.
> If you have subscribed to pkg-ime group and host source at Alioth:
> we can communicate better on this kind of issue. It was tried during
> the pre-wheezy release but it did not go well. So we are doing it now.
> Now with GNOME3.8 (experimental), ibus 1.5 works nicely.
I did not subscribe the mailing list but I do now.
>> Or the upload is only for removing me? That is very confusing to me.
> No ... I was going to make changes for ibus1.5 and change package in
> line with others: team maintained.
> | Source: ibus-array
> | Section: utils
> | Priority: optional
> | Maintainer: IME Packaging Team <pkg-ime-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> | Uploaders: Keng-Yu Lin <kengyu at lexical.tw>, Osamu Aoki <osamu at debian.org>
> | ...
> My thought on upload was to experimental if needed.
> (Maybe just binary rebuild is all needed. I need to lean the recent
> protocol on this transition thing. Now it is more coordinated than
I am happy to get the package maintain by the pkg-img team. This does
Please feel free if you like to upload a change like this. :-)
>> > If I get no response to this in the future, we may remove Keng-Yu from
>> > uploaders to reflect the real situation.
>> Please explain the "real situation"?
> Now that I am happy to hear you active, can you consider joining pkg-ime
> group and host source at alioth like many other packages using Git.
> If you want me to push initial git repo, I can do that.
I am happy to join the pkg-ime group. It is even more appreciated if
you can set up the git repo. As I did not use alioth (I just
registered an account), it could take me a while to set up.
More information about the Pkg-ime-devel