[Pkg-ime-devel] brise: package renaming?
culu.gyx at gmail.com
Sun Jun 1 22:52:02 UTC 2014
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:20:33AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > In version 0.30, several files were replaced with their updated version,
> > under different names.
> > commit c17cd96 (tag: upstream/0.30, 1n1b/upstream)
> > Author: Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx at gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun May 11 18:30:11 2014 -0400
> > Imported Upstream version 0.30
> > delete mode 100644 extra/stroke5.dict.yaml
> > delete mode 100644 extra/stroke5.schema.yaml
> > create mode 100644 preset/bopomofo_tw.schema.yaml
> > create mode 100644 preset/stroke.dict.yaml
> > create mode 100644 preset/stroke.schema.yaml
> > create mode 100644 supplement/sampheng.schema.yaml
> > delete mode 100644 supplement/stroke_simp.dict.yaml
> > delete mode 100644 supplement/stroke_simp.schema.yaml
> > delete mode 100644 supplement/triungkox3p.dict.yaml
> > delete mode 100644 supplement/triungkox3p.schema.yaml
> > I renamed the Debian packages accordingly . Is this OK? If so, do we
> > need to declare conflicts + replace + provide in debian/control?
> I have no strong opinion on this, and if you are changing the package
> names, you need to handle the package transition.
OK. In this case, the new packages don't have filename conflicts
with the old packages, so I'm going to add Provides, but without
Breaks/Conflicts/Replaces. I'll also add a NEWS.Debian to inform
the users of this change, so they can adjust their config files
More information about the Pkg-ime-devel