[Pkg-ime-devel] RFS: marisa/libkkc/ibus-kkc

[Osamu Aoki]

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:34:42AM +0900, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
> 2014-09-25 0:34 GMT+09:00 Mitsuya Shibata <mty.shibata at gmail.com>:
> > Could you help to sporsor for new kkc related packages?
> 
> Please help to sponsor for marisa/libkkc/ibus-kkc packages?
> 
> > - marisa/0.2.4-8
> >   https://mentors.debian.net/package/marisa
> >
> >   Following bug fix release:
> >   #759527: Fail of tests in debci (autopkgtest)
> >   #762001: FBTFS on mips64el

Despite the package name, this is C++ based library.

Please do not add debian/libmarisa0.symbols unless someone said this is the
right thing.  (After reading
http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2012-01/008.html , it does not seem
to be much useful to me.)

If I understand correctly, the symbols file is good idea for C library
but not for C++ due to reasons beyond my knowledge.  Also your symbols file is
not stripping Debian revision causing lintian to give warning.

W: libmarisa0: symbols-file-contains-debian-revision on symbol _ZN6marisa10scope
N:
N:    Debian revisions should be stripped from versions in symbols files. Not
N:    doing so leads to dependencies unsatisfiable by backports (1.0-1~bpo <<
N:    1.0-1 while 1.0-1~bpo >= 1.0). If the debian revision can't be stripped
N:    because the symbol really appeared between two specific Debian
N:    revisions, you should postfix the version with a single "~" (example:
N:    1.0-3~ if the symbol appeared in 1.0-3).
N:
N:    Refer to the dpkg-gensymbols(1) manual page and
N:    https://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles for details.
N:
N:    Severity: normal, Certainty: certain
N:
N:    Check: shared-libs, Type: binary, udeb

Since this does not require recompilation of other programs, let me upload it after fixing this.

Osamu