[PKG-IRC-Maintainers] InspIRCd 2.x backports?

[Christoph Biedl]

Evgeni Golov wrote...

> Building those is as easy as rebuilding the source in a Squeeze chroot. 
> Is there interest from your side in maintaining these backports, or 
> should I do so myself (and/or join the team)?

Well, while I'm de jure part of of the team, I do facto maintain
ngircd only (which has a squeeze backport btw).

Having said that, I cannot see why I should object an inspircd if
you're willing to jump the burning burns of debian-backports and to
maintain a backport until EOL of squeeze-backports. If you do, bring
it on :)

But treat this a my personal opinion, perhaps Matt or one of the other
inspircd maintainers has a different view of that.

Regards,

    Christoph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-irc-maintainers/attachments/20130316/9c49a9d0/attachment.pgp>