[Pkg-iscsi-maintainers] Bug#687925: diff for NMU version 1.4.20.2-10.1

Ross S. W. Walker RWalker at medallion.com
Mon Sep 17 21:47:06 UTC 2012


I have been so busy at my day job I have been negligent of the IET code base.

The bug was fixed in HEAD and not ported to 1.4.20 branch?

If we release 1.4.20.3 you can probably push that through as an update as it's bug-fix only?

Otherwise what you propose is less-stable that an official bug release.

-Ross


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf [mailto:rrs at researchut.com] On Behalf Of Ritesh
> Raj Sarraf
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:49 PM
> To: Arne Redlich; Ross S. W. Walker
> Cc: Loic Dachary; 687925 at bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#687925: diff for NMU version 1.4.20.2-10.1
> 
> Hello Arne / Ross,
> 
> This debian bug, 687925, is release critical for the OpenStack suite.
> OpenStack uses iscsitarget as its storage sub-module.
> 
> As is explained in this bug report, the ietd daemon does not seem to be
> releasing the sparse files that it exposes to the initiator, even after
> the initiator has logged out the sessions.
> 
> This fix, in revision 478, is not part of the stable 1.4.20 branch.
> 
> Debian is in freeze now, and the iscsitarget version that will ship with
> Wheezy is the 1.4.20.2 stable branch.
> 
> Is it safe to pick this one fix against the stable branch?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ritesh
> 
> 
> On Monday 17 September 2012 11:48 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> > On 09/17/2012 07:41 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >> On Monday 17 September 2012 10:28 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >>> On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >>>>> The proposed NMU was based on the assumption that it would be
> >>>>> easier to fix the release critical bug first and then advocate for
> other changes:
> >>>>>
> >>> Agreed. Just that the other bug, that the one in experimental fixes,
> >>> is related to a kernel panic. It is still a minor bug though.
> >>>
> >> I also would have preferred to see this fix in the 1.4.20 stable
> >> branch upstream. When I pulled in the bits yesterday, this fix was
> >> not in the stable branch. Have you asked this upstream?
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not familiar with the iscsitarget upstream. The patch comes from
> > this upstream revision
> >
> > http://iscsitarget.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/iscsitarget?revision=478
> > &view=revision
> >
> > and the rationale for applying it is described in detail in
> >
> > https://launchpad.net/bugs/967984
> >
> > Does that answer your question ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal
> Operating System

______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.


More information about the Pkg-iscsi-maintainers mailing list