[Pkg-iscsi-maintainers] dh(1)-based packaging pushed to unstable, signed my old git tags

Ritesh Raj Sarraf rrs at researchut.com
Tue May 12 09:15:19 UTC 2015

On Sunday 03 May 2015 05:01 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Yes. We should transition to the newer tools.
> 3. I've completely rewritten debian/rules to use dh(1) instead of manual
> calls to dh_*. Also, I'm now using debian/*.install instead of manual
> calls to install in the rules file. This simplifies things quite a bit,
> since one now doesn't have to check if we are building against an arch
> that supports udebs or not (debhelper does that for us).

I just pulled in the changes and had a look. Wow.. That's a lot of
clean-up you've done. :-)

Let's get this into Unstable asap, so that users can use any report
bugs, if any.

Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-iscsi-maintainers/attachments/20150512/980e25cc/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-iscsi-maintainers mailing list