[Pkg-isocodes-devel] iso-codes licensing

[Tobias Toedter]

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:55:39 +0200
Tobias Toedter <t.toedter at gmx.net> wrote:

> So the question arises if it should not be possible to use the GPL.

Hi all,

I've taken this question to -legal[1] and it seems to me that it's more
or less irrelevant for the XML data files which license we apply to
them. Either GPL or LGPL seems to be fine, because the data we provide
in the XML files cannot be "linked" against.

As we provide some Python scripts as well (which are currently licensed
under GPL), should we use the GPL as the overall license for iso-codes?

[1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00107.html>

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
Tobias Toedter   | "I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad
Hamburg, Germany | to make an exception." -- Groucho Marx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-isocodes-devel/attachments/20071203/01ffffd1/attachment.pgp