[Pkg-isocodes-devel] Ashamed by the name of our package

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Tobias Toedter (t.toedter at gmx.net):

> Yes, I would be in for that. Do you already have an action in mind? We
> could rename the package, but what name should we choose? Just a
> generic one like "iso-codes", so that users can think of the contents
> by reading the name? Or should we come up with a fantasy name which
> does not resemble the iso-codes name?


Renaming the package would be an unfair punishment of our users (and
to us: dealing with transitions is not that easy).

ISO is not necessarily at fault here, after all, this is an
organisation who gathers National Standard bodies.

Those who suck, indeed, are those National Standards bodies who voted
yes (DE, IE) or abstained (FR).

Only something really symbolic should be done: we don't want to punish
our users for the behaviour of ISO members.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-isocodes-devel/attachments/20080403/4d0563a7/attachment.pgp