[Pkg-isocodes-devel] iso-codes licensing

[Tobias Toedter]

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:51:02 +0100
Tobias Toedter <t.toedter at gmx.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:55:39 +0200
> Tobias Toedter <t.toedter at gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> > So the question arises if it should not be possible to use the GPL.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've taken this question to -legal[1] and it seems to me that it's
> more or less irrelevant for the XML data files which license we apply
> to them. Either GPL or LGPL seems to be fine, because the data we
> provide in the XML files cannot be "linked" against.
> 
> As we provide some Python scripts as well (which are currently
> licensed under GPL), should we use the GPL as the overall license for
> iso-codes?
> 
> [1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00107.html>

Hello,

are there any opinions on this? Should we change the license to GPL?

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
Tobias Toedter   | Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard
Hamburg, Germany | disk?


-- 
Tobias Toedter   | In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said,
Hamburg, Germany | "Let there be Light." And there was still nothing,
                 | but you could see a bit better.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-isocodes-devel/attachments/20080424/f1064d8f/attachment.pgp