[Pkg-isocodes-devel] New template for 'iso_3166' made available

[Benno Schulenberg]

LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> A somehow-bad-beginning.

Not so bad.  It's just the URL that's incorrect (in the emails), the 
POT files are the right ones.  The URLs for isocodes are not really 
important because the strings speak for themselves, the translators 
won't be looking at the tarball for helpful context.

> currently the domain page have been fixed(e.g. [1]), but I don't
> know whether it will have side effect if I run po-register again.

It would simply fail, because all the merged PO files already exist: 
no mail would be sent out.

In short: just let it be.  Translators will be clever enough to 
notice the mismatch too, when they do want to fetch the tarball.

Benno