50_emacs-bindings.dpatch

[Jörg Sommer]

--48TaNjbzBVislYPb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Wed 01. Jun, 09:54 (+0200):
> * J=F6rg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> [2005-05-31 16:07]:
>=20
> > Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Tue 31. May, 10:37 (+0200):
> > > At any rate, before getting too carried on about the idea of using
> > > debconf, it would be a good idea to ask the opinion of others in the
> > > debian-devel mailing list. The developers-reference manual tells us to
> > > not abuse debconf
> >=20
> > Are you shure this is an abuse? Exactly this example is made in
> > debconf-devel(7).
>=20
> I frankly do not know whether this is an abuse or not.  Could you please
> ask the question in debian-devel (keep Cc: to the pkg-jed-devel mailing
> list)?

There was a heavy discussion after my posting to debian-devel and I would
follow the argumentation of Peter Palfrader to not use debconf.

--=20
Man soll Denken lehren, nicht Gedachtes.

--48TaNjbzBVislYPb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQssBkoZ13Cz2nwVYAQI6owgApbhSJHdaQ2GSQvCYatwyF3vcEH1DT42Z
38fJRFDGlQTIuuNyCXUTGDwQ8mq+c1tCR6ACeVGcvjMvl860/AOu+GuhpUyb3J95
YeSPu2Y3GSa6H/inM4kQP7OWmZq8VYmvqS2EFNsUlQUaJiWkTmWNZHqqZgU5f4D9
5LEo9feyAX+C7Ho+zDfcL5qBfFlG/poun9aLeb2w5GcoctXm6UwQ16HnCdNipO9u
RtY1y6mbk13jCmGH31YAMHwQUTp1fZhKz6NWyxwwysA/N8YW5wYo+fkSVhf56mUe
VXQ9s8aXjQMtyz1sEYbo2ulZbu+eLyZOsWEk11+3JDIg+AsGHjSMMQ==
=zxeE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--48TaNjbzBVislYPb--