update of jed-extra
G. Milde
g.milde@web.de
Mon Jul 11 08:30:34 UTC 2005
On 8.07.05, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> G. Milde schrieb am Thu 07. Jul, 09:38 (+0200):
> > Which jed-extra modes should be activated?
> > Alternatively to the exclusion_list now in make_ini, we could introduce a
> > "whitelist" of modes to generate autoloads or INITIALIZATION blocks in
> > ini.sl.
>
> I don't know. My present thought is, should jed-extra change the
> behaviour of jed or should jed look the same with and without
> jed-extra?
It should look the same, so I would not auto-activate a different colour
scheme. ;-)
However, it should provide superior convenience, so I would e.g. activate
help.sl (hyperhelp) to have "hyper-links" in the online help system and
context sensitive help with Shift-F1.
As the perception of "superior" varies, the list of modes to be
activated should be configurable. IMHO, this is a debconf task. We should
agree on and provide a default choice.
> For example, should jed-extra overwrite modes in jed?
Drop-in replacements are a bit tricky, as they are active already when
placed in the library path. We might have to store them elsewhere (or
under a different name) and activate by a symlink.
Günter
--
G.Milde web.de
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel
mailing list