Rafael Laboissiere <email@example.com>
Sun, 1 May 2005 18:41:20 +0200
First of all, thanks for the housekeeping regarding the bugs, which I
* Jörg Sommer <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-05-01 16:54]:
> what to do with #266981? It discribes that 00site.sl and 99defaults.sl
> aren't removed from /etc/jed-init.d/. But in the woody and unstable
> version these files aren't in the package. Maybe there where problems on
> the system of the bug report submitter while updating to the version
> without 00site.sl and 99defaults.sl
I think that these files existed at some point in testing. People who
installed the version of the jed-common package that contained them have the
files left in the system after the upgrade.
> Should we tag this as wontfix or unreproducable or should we close this
> bug report, because it problem doesn't exist in current version.
No, according to what I wrote above, this is a real bug. We should remove
them in one of the maintainer scripts of the jed-common package. The
postinst script seems to be the best place for doing it.
Jörg, do you want to implement this, or should I do it?