structure in SVN (was: Re: [Pkg-jed-commit] r81 - tags/packages trunk/packages trunk/packages/slgdbm)

[Jörg Sommer]

Hello Rafael,

Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Mon 26. Sep, 09:11 (+0200):
> * Jörg Sommer <joerg at alea.gnuu.de> [2005-09-25 22:53]:
> 
> > Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Sun 25. Sep, 18:42 (+0000):
> > > Added:
> > >    tags/packages/slgdbm/
> > >    trunk/packages/slgdbm/
> > >    trunk/packages/slgdbm/debian/
> > 
> > A suggestion: All directories below trunk/packages include only on entry.
> > Why not remove the packages part and place them all under trunk?
> 
> Are you proposing this:
> 
>     trunk/
>       www/
>       jed/
>       jed-extra/
>       slgdbm/
> 
> ?

Yes.

> Unless I am misunderstanding your proposal, this seems to me quite a
> gratuitous change and will force me to change the DJG Guidelines too, for
> no sensible benefit.  Besides, I prefer to keep www/ and packages/ under
> trunk.

My intention is to not have a overstructured directory layout. What else
should be placed in the truck directory? Having only packages and www in
this directory is IMO very less.

Or if you would like to keep packages, why not place the contents of
$FOO/debian under $FOO?

My intention is, that is really annoying to type in this very long paths.
e.g. svn/pkg-jed/trunk/packages/jed/debian/patches/00list. This could
be svn/pkg-jed/trunk/jed/patches/00list

Bye, Jörg.
-- 
Es ist außerdem ein weit verbreiteter Irrtum das USENET "helfen" soll.
Tatsächlich wurde USENET nachweislich zur persönlichen Belustigung
seiner Erfinder geschaffen.
Jörg Klemenz <joerg at gmx.net>, <b4ai4o$1u8vmt$2 at ID-21915.news.dfncis.de>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20050926/04094576/attachment.pgp