slgdbm_1.6-2_i386.changes is NEW
g.milde at web.de
Tue Sep 27 06:19:06 UTC 2005
On 26.09.05, Paul Boekholt wrote:
> I should have brought this up sooner, but isn't slfoo too shortish
> for a debian package name? The perl policy says:
> naming convention for module Foo::Bar is libfoo-bar-perl.
> The Python naming scheme seems to be python-foo.
I vote vor slang-foo. (Not only because I like python more than perl, but
because this way slang modules will appear close to slang in an alphabetical
listing (e.g. in aptitude or `ls /usr/share/doc/`).
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel