Release Jed 0.99.18-1
G. Milde
g.milde at web.de
Tue May 16 14:41:31 UTC 2006
On 16.05.06, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * G. Milde <g.milde at web.de> [2006-05-16 13:43]:
>
> > BTW: What is the difference of README.debian vs.
> > jed-common.README.Debian?
>
> This is a real problem, thanks for spotting it. It seems that only
> jed-common.README.Debian is installed as /usr/share/doc/jed/README.Debian
> and that README.Debian is never installed. This happens because
> /usr/share/doc/jed is a symlink to /usr/share/doc/jed-common.
..
> At any rate, we must update the text in README.Debian, which refers to
> version 0.99-17 of JED.
I simply replaced README.Debian with jed-common.README.Debian. (Version
specific info should IMO go to either the Debian changelog or the NEWS file.)
> > > * Cope with the jedstate package, which will be become useless
> > > with the new jed pacakge
> >
> > Could we just replace|conflict?
>
> Yes, this is what I thought.
Second thought: conflict with the current version jedstate (<= 0.5.4-5)
This way the maintainer has a chance to decide
whether to update the package or to let
gdbmrecent replace it.
The conflict is in the naming of the
jed-config-dir (now /etc/jed.d/) and maybe more
...
> There is now the gdbmrecent package that
> can provide the same functionality of jedstate.
Is gdbmrecent a separate package or part of jed-extra?
> We might provide a script to convert the ~/.jedstate.db file into the
> ~/.recent_db file of gdbmrecent. That should not be too complicated, since
> both have the same type:
>
> $ file ~/.recent_db ~/.jedstate.db
> /home/rafael/.recent_db: GNU dbm 1.x or ndbm database, little endian
> /home/rafael/.jedstate.db: GNU dbm 1.x or ndbm database, little endian
It would be nice if you could contact the jedstate maintainer Michael Hummel
mailto:mhummel at debian.org and discuss the issue with him (or
invite him to discuss it here on the list).
Günter
--
Milde ife.et.tu-dresden.de
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel
mailing list