[RFU?] temexpand 0.1.2.0-2 (was: Re: r792 - tmexpand/trunk/debian)

[Jörg Sommer]

Hallo Rafael,

Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Tue 03. Jul, 19:02 (+0200):
> * Jörg Sommer <joerg at alea.gnuu.de> [2007-07-03 00:24]:
> 
> > Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Mon 02. Jul, 17:05 (+0200):
> > > tmexpand entered unstable recently.  Should we upload 0.1.2.0-2?
> > 
> > Yes. I don't expect any further changes.
> 
> Lintian 1.23.32 in sid is yielding the following error message for the
> tmexpand package as in SVN:
> 
> E: tmexpand: missing-dep-for-interpreter jed-script => jed (./usr/bin/tmexpand)
> N:
> N:   You used an interpreter for a script that is not in an essential
> N:   package. In most cases you will need to add a Dependency on the
> N:   package that contains the interpreter.
> N:
> N:   In some cases a weaker relationship, such as Suggests or Recommends,
> N:   will be more appropriate.
> 
> It looks like a false alarm.  I will investigate the issue later this week
> but if you have an idea about the issue, please address it.

I send a bug report to lintian.

Schöne Grüße, Jörg.
-- 
Wir leben zwar unter dem gleichen Himmel,
müssen aber nicht zwangsläufig den gleichen Horizont haben.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20070704/343a5aff/attachment.pgp