[Pkg-jed-commit] r683 - in jed-extra/trunk/debian: . examples patches

G. Milde milde at users.sourceforge.net
Tue May 15 09:14:26 UTC 2007


On 14.05.07, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * milde-guest at alioth.debian.org <milde-guest at alioth.debian.org> [2007-05-14 10:42]:

> > Author: milde-guest
> > Date: 2007-05-14 10:42:05 +0000 (Mon, 14 May 2007)
> > New Revision: 683
> > 
> > [...]
> > --- jed-extra/trunk/debian/changelog	2007-05-13 10:21:18 UTC (rev 682)
> > +++ jed-extra/trunk/debian/changelog	2007-05-14 10:42:05 UTC (rev 683)
> > @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
> > -jed-extra (2.3.1) experimental; urgency=low
> > -  DO NOT RELEASE YET, WAIT FOR NEW UPSTREAM RELEASE
> > +jed-extra (2.3.2) experimental; urgency=low
> > +  <New upstream release finally out: Please check and release>

> This is great, thanks Guenter.  I guess that the upstream tarball should be
> generated using get-orig-source.  This is what I see here:

> $ ls -l jed-extra_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rafael rafael 459744 2007-05-14 19:37 jed-extra_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz

Strange, here, after building with utils/build-from-svn-copy.sh (which calls
get-orig-source under the way) I get a different size:

pkg-jed/jed-extra/trunk > ls -l jed-extra_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r-- 1 milde milde 459751 2007-05-15 09:08 jed-extra_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz

but the same md5sum 

> $ tar tfz jed-extra_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz | md5sum
> 9790336509fecf6942f56c1b6263bdd6  -

  9790336509fecf6942f56c1b6263bdd6  -

is equal. This shows at least that the content is (most probabely)
identical.

> Should I go ahead and use this tarball?

I think so. I cannot verify truly independent, as
jed-extra_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz is build from
jedmodes-$(UPSTREAM_VERSION).tgz and
http://www.cis.fu-berlin.de/~phgrau/slang/boxquote.sl

Do you think it helps to test the md5sum of jedmodes-2.3.2.tgz?

At the sourceforge shell (where I created jedmodes-2.3.2.tgz, I get

  #> tar tfz jedmodes-2.3.2.tgz | md5sum
  80f0ea0528f26d8db1bb68b2288c2726  -

> Another question: is it intentional that the distribution is "experimental",
> or should we upload the package to unstable?

"experimental" is a paranoia setting. (We had problems with upload to
unstable earlier as there were conflicts with the stable version, but
this should be sorted out by now.)

If it is ok to upload to unstable, this would be preferable. 


Guenter



More information about the Pkg-jed-devel mailing list