[Pkg-jed-commit] r701 - jed/branches/0.99.19/debian

[Jörg Sommer]

Rafael Laboissiere schrieb am Wed 16. May, 22:51 (+0000):
> Author: rafael
> Date: 2007-05-16 22:51:07 +0000 (Wed, 16 May 2007)
> New Revision: 701
> 
> Modified: jed/branches/0.99.19/debian/changelog
> ===================================================================
> --- jed/branches/0.99.19/debian/changelog	2007-05-16 22:41:00 UTC (rev 700)
> +++ jed/branches/0.99.19/debian/changelog	2007-05-16 22:51:07 UTC (rev 701)
> @@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
> -jed (0.99.19~pre78-1) experimental; urgency=low
> +jed (0.99.19.+pre78-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>  
>    * New upstream release, taken from the upstream SVN repository at
> -    gna.org.
> +    gna.org [JS]
> +  * Changed the upstream version numbering scheme, where the number after
> +    "+pre" corresponds to the micro version of the unstable Jed
> +    branch. [RL]
> +  * debian/rules:
> +    + Simplified the get-orig-source rule [JS]

Do you think we should mention such changes in the /Debian/ changelog?
They aren't visible to and interesting for a package user.

> +    + The upstream version is obtained by parsing debian/changelog [RL]
> +    + Remove *.orig.tar.gz in the clean rule

Why? We need it for a new debian version (-2) and I read in d-policy
there is a project running that rebuilds the source two times: build
clean build. Then the source build would fail.

> -JED_VER=0.99.19~pre78
> +JED_VER=${shell perl -ne '/\(([^-]+)-/; print $$1; last' < debian/changelog}

Doesn't make use $() instead of ${}?

Bye, Jörg.
-- 
“Perl—the only language that looks the same
 before and after RSA encryption.”           (Keith Bostic)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20070517/b211e22b/attachment.pgp