<p dir="ltr">I am quite hopeful that arm will be fully supported for 0.5.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-viral</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 3 Dec 2015 3:19 a.m., "Peter Colberg" <<a href="mailto:peter@colberg.org">peter@colberg.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:36:19PM +0000, Peter Colberg wrote:<br>
> - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> commit 041ccf0623957bb87877e7270af516dee505383c<br>
> Author: Peter Colberg <<a href="mailto:peter@colberg.org">peter@colberg.org</a>><br>
> Date:   Wed Dec 2 07:27:25 2015 -0500<br>
><br>
>     Build depend on llvm-3.8-dev | llvm-3.7-dev | llvm-3.6-dev<br>
><br>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Graham, could you do a source-only upload of 0.4.1-2 to experimental?<br>
<br>
This fixes the FTBFS on i386 and improves performance on amd64 and i386.<br>
<br>
With regard to the test suite, I now think that we should just keep<br>
things as is. An arch-specific list of skipped tests adds complexity<br>
to the Debian package without actually fixing the issues upstream.<br>
<br>
I suggest to work together with upstream to fix the armhf and ppc64el<br>
issues as time permits. When the time comes (probably not before 0.5)<br>
we enable the test suite on those archs, too.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Peter<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pkg-julia-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pkg-julia-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org">Pkg-julia-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-julia-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-julia-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>