<p dir="ltr">Realistically, Julia users will want to use the Julia package manager to manage dependencies which are at this stage fast moving. </p>
<p dir="ltr">In my opinion, it is best not to package them.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-viral</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 25 May 2016 10:34 a.m., "Graham Inggs" <<a href="mailto:ginggs@debian.org">ginggs@debian.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 20/05/2016 23:13, Peter Colberg wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Graham, what are your thoughts on maintaining Julia packages in Debian?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think it would be great if we carried Julia packages in Debian, however I am not convinced it would be worth the effort.<br>
<br>
<br>
Completely unrelated:<br>
The double-conversion library has been orphaned [1].<br>
Any objections to me adopting it on behalf of pkg-julia?<br>
<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/815264" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/815264</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pkg-julia-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pkg-julia-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org" target="_blank">Pkg-julia-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-julia-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-julia-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>