[Pkg-lirc-maint] lirc modules selection question
Stephen Gran
sgran at debian.org
Mon Nov 13 22:52:03 CET 2006
Hello all,
A couple of questions:
Do we want to ship an lirc-modules-${kvers} binary package?
I've never done this, but it doesn't look that difficult. It seems
like it would be reasonably nice for users.
Why does the modules-source package only default to building a few
modules? Do others often FTBFS?
Related to the previous question:
If I just say "oh, go on, build them all", can I ditch this giant
infrastructure for passing around CFLAGS and such? I'm just not seeing
the utility of it right now. Or am I missing something obvious? Any
counter arguments? Did a bug submitter previously only want to build
their one single module and have it all perfectly debconfized? Is that
a valid use case? Will I ever stop asking questions?
OK, enough silliness. Sorry,
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : sgran at debian.org |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lirc-maint/attachments/20061113/885b19ba/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-lirc-maint
mailing list