[Pkg-ltsp-devel] ltsp bzr branch

Gustavo Franco gustavorfranco at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 16:05:04 UTC 2006


On 1/6/06, Otavio Salvador <otavio at debian.org> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Closing, i'm thinking in spend some time this weekend importing and
> > reviewing ltspfs and ltspfsd (two sources) from Ubuntu. Probably i'll
> > need testers in the next week before uploading to Debian. Yes,  i
> > don't ITPed these yet but i'll do so under group name, once we reach a
> > decision if we will use "Debian LTSP Maintainers", "Debian/Ubuntu LTSP
> > Maintainers" (i see this Debian/Ubuntu thing before) or whatever.
> > Opinions?
>
> I like the idea of Debian/Ubuntu LTSP Maintainer. This makes clear to
> everyone that we're working together on it.

Yes, i agree.

> I prefer to use Matt current branch as our initial branch. We could
> copy it to our Alioth directory to make it work for us.
>
> What do you all think about it?

I'm not sure about import Matt current branch into Alioth, where's it?
Is there a branch with latest debian package (0.58debian4) there ?

FYI, the latest ltsp ubuntu package is 0.62, if Matt is maintaining a
branch just for this and it isn't possible atm jump on 0.62 (due to
Debian/Ubuntu differences) i would opt for move pere baz repository.

I'm sure that the best option is jump into the latest (0.62) and put
it in shape for Debian, it will of course help Matt and Ogra reducing
the Ubuntu delta and Debian to be up-to-date. Comments on the work
needed are welcome.

Thanks,
Gustavo Franco



More information about the Pkg-ltsp-devel mailing list