[Pkg-ltsp-devel] moving towards arch all

[Otavio Salvador]

Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry.com> writes:

> [Otavio Salvador]
>> My POV is a little different. Instead to move it to another source
>> package we can try to rewrite it in a script language like python,
>> ruby or perl. Doing that we remove a lot of complexity from building
>> system, make it arch all and simplefy the development of it.
>> 
>> What y'all think about it?
>
> We should only do this if it do not slow down the boot, increase the
> memory footprint and make us deviate further from the "official" LTSP
> packages from ltsp.org.

The number of access done using getltspcfg isn't too high so I doesn't
think it might affect the boot speed.

I agree that it should be coordenated with LTSP first also because if
we'll to do that they should use our work otherwise is lost time.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."