[Pkg-ltsp-devel] please review LTSP debconf templates

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting vagrant at freegeek.org (vagrant at freegeek.org):

> is the following patch considered the final patch properly reviewed by
> the debian-l10n-english team? as a maintainer, i will be happy to apply

Given the lack of further comments, I think you can consider Justin's
proposal to be final.

> it. let me know so i can proceed to ask for updated translations.
> 
> a related aside, is there a document for recommended procedure for
> english reviews? as an ltsp maintainer, i would prefer a bug report
> filed in the debian bts when the review is finished... but i don't know
> what the standard or current operating practice is.


There is no such formal process. The main activity is currently
reviews initiated sequentially for packages with debconf templates,
taken one by one by popcon score (plus packages that introduce new
debconf templates). Such reviews indeed lead to a bug report.

However, when reviews are initiated by a package maintainer, we have
no formal process paart from threading in debian-l10n-english (with
maintainer CC'ed). It is really up to the maintainer to take the
conclusions from our suggestions.

That could be improved...but the "team" doing this review is really
small as of now..:-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ltsp-devel/attachments/20071018/1b853723/attachment.pgp