[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] [Fwd: Plans for pkg-lustre]

[Patrick Winnertz]

Am Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2007 14:37:45 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Yes. I added it to the trunk as far as it is done at all.
Yes I see.

> I used build as build dir. So for top dirs you have
>
> debian
> lustre-version
> build

Mh... I talked with Noel (we both work in the same company) and we had a 
look at the pkg-kolab svn. 
I like their approach of having only the debian dir in trunk and in 
upstream the orig.tar.gz's. 

This has the advantage that we could use svn-buildpackage to build the 
package automatically and we have the debian dir seperated. 
What do you think?

>
> If we drop the lustre-version subdir and have the original
> lustre.tar.gz as orig.tar.gz and the debian dir in diff.gz then
> debian/build will be better. If not a must. Lustre already has a build
> subdir that would conflict.
>
> In fact, since lustre-version/build exists, debian/objdir or something
> non similar sounding would be even better. or?

Okay the name of the build-dir is all the same for me. If you like we could 
change to: debian/objdir

Greetings
Patrick


> Is the BTS subscribed?
Not yet, but now.