Bug#779579: installer broken: multipath-udeb depends on non-existent libgcc1 udeb

Cyril Brulebois kibi at debian.org
Wed Mar 4 12:25:50 UTC 2015


Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs at debian.org> (2015-03-04):
> On 03/04/2015 05:00 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> > Thanks! I just tested the package in incoming.d.o and it's OK.
> 
> THank you very much for confirming with test results.

Yep, definitely appreciated.

> > If you or Cyril could please educate me:
> > 
> > For it to reach the d-i Packages file (so it's available for installs),
> > does it require a d-i rebuild, or it's an automatic process?
> >
> 
> d-i images are built weekly. So, if the unblock goes through, it'll
> migrate into testing, and then the next d-i weekly snapshot should
> include it.
> 
> > (I'm unsure; there's no multipath-udeb listed in d-i build log.)
> 
> I'm not sure about this. Cyril should be able to provide more insight.
> He's part of the d-i team.

For udebs that aren't used during the debian-installer build process (as
in: source package going through build.debian.org like other packages,
or being built daily -- see d-i.debian.org), they're either fetch from
the installation image (CD/DVD/USB flash drive etc.) or from the
network. That's the case for multipath-udeb, so you won't need a d-i
(re)build, just the propagation of the relevant package to testing, and
a subsequent installation image build, e.g. a weekly installation image
build, or a full release.

Mraw,
KiBi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lvm-maintainers/attachments/20150304/3de368f4/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-lvm-maintainers mailing list