Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

[Kel Modderman]

Julien Valroff wrote:

>[...]
>Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:15 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit :
>  
>
>>90% of the time i also use kernel-package, not m-a, but that is not the 
>>point. I believe m-a lays the best framework for the average user to 
>>easily install a module.
>>    
>>
>I totally agree, but I think the best choice is to let the user choice
>what he wants, with a default choice for non power users.
>
>  
>
>>>Regarding the documentation, maybe it would be good to insist on the
>>>kernel-package method too.
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>I would certainly enjoy receiving contributed documentation :-)
>>    
>>
>
>Good point ;-)
>[...]
>
>  
>
>>Ok, i see two alternatives:-
>>
>>1)
>>Package: madwifi-source
>>Architecture: all
>>Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), build-essential, module-assistant | 
>>kernel-package, sharutils, bzip2
>>
>>or
>>
>>2)
>>Package: madwifi-source
>>Architecture: all
>>Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), build-essential, module-assistant, 
>>sharutils, bzip2
>>Recommends: kernel-package
>>
>>Which would you prefer? Would that be enough to satisfy your wish?
>>    
>>
>
>The first is the the best imo, as it really lets the user free not to
>have m-a installed.
>
>Cheers,
>Julien
>  
>

Ok, done. Will be like that in next upload.

Thanks, Kel.