feedback sought on mdadm sarge->etch upgrade strategy

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 14, martin f krafft <madduck at debian.org> wrote:

> > devfs does not matter, it's not supported by etch anyway.
> Is this official? Please point me somewhere. I seem to recall we do
> support 2.4 kernels and those still have devfs, right?
We don't, this was discussed on debian-kernel and debian-release over
the last few months. And devfsd is not in etch.

> The feature can be turned off, and as soon as I manage to get
> reproducible and reliable behaviour from udev, I will.
?

> Do note, however, that it seems that udev creates these symlinks
> already if I create a /dev/md/X device.
Only with compat.rules or compat-full.rules.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mdadm-devel/attachments/20060814/c26144cc/attachment.pgp