mdadm 2.4.1-1 ready for tests

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:55:54PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> I just don't think there's a big point in duplicating information in
> the Debian changelog.

I see debian work as tailoring upstream one so that it best fits our
users. Selecting the appropriate information from the upstream changelog
that describe how bugs reported in our BTS got closed is part of such
tailoring.

Beside that and more practical: why documenting "closes:" in
debian/changelog if the users have no way to understand them? If it is
only for automatically closing bugs with the upload there is something
wrong with the usage of the instrument.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mdadm-devel/attachments/20060517/cd02b34d/attachment.pgp