Bug#496130: base-installer: apt-install'ed packages do not have their debconf questions translated

Jérémy Bobbio lunar at debian.org
Sat Aug 23 08:17:35 UTC 2008


On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:59:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elendil at planet.nl):
> 
> > It is actually a side-effect of my changes to get rid of all those 
> > annoying perl warnings. I forgot that mdadm has a debconf template while 
> > making those changes.
> 
> Hmmm, reading this, I understand that there are situations where mdadm
> templates are used during the installation.
> 
> If we follow the theory that drove us up to now, it means that mdadm
> should be added to one of the D-I "levels", similarly to xorg, samba,
> popcon and a few other "regular" packages that are likely to display
> something during some kind of installs.
> 
> I would then be tempted to add mdadm to "level 4" as it will be used
> only in some "specific" situations. Am I right ?

mdadm is installed on every system using software RAID partitions.
The templates allowing one to define software RAID partitions in
mdcfg-utils are in sublevel 3.

That would make mdadm sublevel 3 to me, but mdadm should not ask
questions at high priority, so sublevel 4 would be fine, if I did get a
proper grasp of the logic beyond sublevels… :)

Cheers,
-- 
Jérémy Bobbio                        .''`. 
lunar at debian.org                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 
                                      `-   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mdadm-devel/attachments/20080823/e17bf842/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-mdadm-devel mailing list