Bug#509167: mdadm: check asprintf() return codes

Neil Brown neilb at suse.de
Sun Feb 1 23:55:36 UTC 2009


On Thursday January 8, kirkland at canonical.com wrote:
> Neil-
> 
> One more follow-up on this patch...
> 
> I actually think that the code in the inline function should :
> 
> -       ret = asprintf(strp, fmt, ap);
> +       ret = vasprintf(strp, fmt, ap);
> 
> Otherwise, we might fill ap into the format string, and have bad things
> happen...
> 
> Cheers,
> :-Dustin

Yes, of course.  Thanks.

I've applied this now.

NeilBrown





More information about the pkg-mdadm-devel mailing list