WARNING: updated udev package!

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Marco d'Itri <md at Linux.IT> [2009.03.19.1843 +0100]:
> No because they call mdadm. This is commented in the upstream
> rules but Fedora and Ubuntu do it. I think you should look at the
> Ubuntu package. While it's /possible/ to use md without mdadm
> I think it's a corner case not very relevant.

Fair enough, and I was hoping I could avoid the udev syntax, which
I really really really really really dislike.

Anyway, I'll get on it, but I truly don't know when I will have this
kind of time.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
this space intentionally left blank.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mdadm-devel/attachments/20090319/b9623a85/attachment.pgp