Bug#569359: mdadm -Ds insists on /dev/md/X device presence
martin f krafft
madduck at debian.org
Tue Jun 8 10:37:38 UTC 2010
also sprach Martin Michlmayr <tbm at cyrius.com> [2010.06.08.1124 +0200]:
> > It would be safer to use
> > mdadm -As
> > to ensure all arrays are assembled, then
> > mdadm -Ds
> > to create mdadm.conf
> >
> > ... but why do you even want to create mdadm.conf ???
>
> I'll let madduck answer this.
I have not yet found a way to ensure stable device names without an
mdadm.conf, so I have not yet made it optional. The current push to
UUID-based device access in combination with incremental assembly
might be the key.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"arrogance on the part of the meritorious is even more
offensive to us than the arrogance of those without merit:
for merit itself is offensive."
-- friedrich nietzsche
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mdadm-devel/attachments/20100608/12d65415/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-mdadm-devel
mailing list