Which packaging scheme to adopt ?

[Maxime Chatelle]

Hi,

While topgit seem to be a good tool, it is cruelly lacking 
documentation (no manpage, just a little howto in share/doc) and is 
not widely used. Maybe using a more common packaging scheme can ease 
future team work. I think about git-buildpackage or any other tool.

I'm not against topgit, I just prefer to ask before import 3.2.2 from 
upstream.

What is your opinion ?


And, if you have time, I will be happy if you can introduce mdadm 
packaging and various issues. I new in debian packaging and I don't 
clearly understand why git repo have all these branches (like "build" 
branch).


Good holidays ! :-)
 xakz
-- 
Maxime Chatelle, human from earth, 010001111.cm94IGxvdmVyCg==.kpr
<mchatelle ↯ linux-france ↯ org> <mmyc ↯ gmx ↯ com>
79E0 25F5 06C5 5C7F F57C BADD 13EE 911A 8A1A 9DE9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mdadm-devel/attachments/20110714/5dd1f1d8/attachment.pgp>