Bug#556610: Bug#677504: lintian fixes

[Sergey Kirpichev]

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:13:32PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >Would be nice, if you take look on #556610 too.
> 
> Yes, but this one is a feature/enhancement.  I'm not sure we ever want to
> go this route -- the result smells too complicated.

What exactly?  Every day we run 1/X'th part of job (by default, X=28)
for 1 hour.  That should be enough for arrays upto 10Tb out of box.
And, of course, it' adjustable by local admin.

The whole set of arrays would be checked fully every month in average,
on a regular basis.  There is a trouble, mentioned in #556610, when
arrays are sharing common devices.

> Well, the sizes of the
> typical arrays are increasing, and hence the time required to complete the
> checks, so it becomes more and more important, so we have to do something
> with that.

Yep.  And that is why #556610 looks as an important whishlist item.