Bug#364228: fixed in mesa 6.4.2-1
Marcelo E. Magallon
mmagallo at debian.org
Fri Jun 2 01:53:47 UTC 2006
Hi,
sorry about the late reply, the mail got filed in a place I didn't
expect it to show up.
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > * debian/control: b-d on x11proto-gl-dev. Please don't hate me!
>
> I'm afraid I don't get this one.
I might be wrong, but doesn't that create a circular dependency?
> > + Built only for i386: ffb.
> > Rationale: Michel Dänzer said so, no idea why.
>
> I beg your pardon? I said no such thing. AFAIK FFB hardware is only
> available in Sun SPARC machines. The reason why it's built upstream
> by default is to catch trivial build failures.
Well, I can go hunting for the mail if you wish (I'd rather not), but I
remember making the change prompted by a mail of yours. I obviously
misunderstood.
So, it's SPARC-only then?
> > * configs/debian*_i386: disabled, optimized build fuxxored.
>
> I'd really appreciate details instead of yet more witty remarks.
Ah, yes, sorry... I still owe you that mail.
Let's see...
If I start any OpenGL client with the optimized libraries I get a
missing symbol (gl_dispatch_functions_start).
The symbol is defined (says me) in mesa-6.4.2/src/mesa/x86/glapi_x86.S
and there's a line:
HIDDEN(GLNAME(gl_dispatch_functions_start))
I tried removing this line and the problem persists. Since I found no
reports of such a problem I assumed it has something to do with the one
thing that different in sid at the moment: GCC 4.1.
I think I alsa tried with
GLOBL GLNAME(gl_dispatch_functions_start)
but I'm not sure honestly.
Marcelo
More information about the Pkg-mesa-devel
mailing list