[Pkg-mono-devel] Tangerine: why repackaged? (or: why +dfsg?)

[David Paleino]

On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:20:57 +0000, jcsogo at gmail.com wrote:

> Do not delete +dsfg suffix and do not use upstream tarball. I will elaborate
> once in front of a computer, but you should read policy meanwhile. No pun
> intended.

I probably got what you mean, and why you repackaged the source... sorry for the
noise! :)

(probably I was just too quick in sending the mail, without thinking first)

Sorry again,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mono-devel/attachments/20080920/e1ddda1f/attachment.pgp